The Noble Eightfold Path when done a Buddhist becomes.
By Buddhists for suffering the end is desired.
Life as suffering when assumed
rebirth as suffering is assumed.
Thus the rebirth cycle end could be desired.
Buddhism, while admirable,
to liberty the importance since not accorded
for rebirth a freedom world is not attained.
By any mind nirvana if attained
rebirth is abstained.
From Nirvana since not returning
a conundrum is surmised.
By any mind is Nirvana attained and sustained?
At first Buddhism might seem simple
but unlike Jesus's message
in a single sentence can not be summarized.
Jesus message was "to the poor give and every person forgive."
The author is not a Buddhism expert.
But the goals are not entirely dissimilar.
The suffering end is desired.
By Jesus also the suffering end
the deprivation infliction end were desired.
Liberty when sustained suffering is minimized.
Anything needed by merely asking is attained.
On freedom worlds suffering is minimized.
But where life exists death exists.
Where death exists suffering exists.
A supposition follows.
By a Buddhist all proclivities when ended
desire and craving no longer exist.
Between death and life Nirvana exists.
Into worlds through the windows
the mind never looks.
World doors are never crossed.
Nirvana while sustained
the Buddhists forever waits.
The Nirvana reality approximation if sufficient
for minds the apathy if sufficient
Nirvana can be attained.
To liberty the importance if accorded
liberty since desired
on a freedom world rebirth is attained.
In that regard Buddhists minds and free minds differ.
On freedom world rebirth or
between death and life eternally in solitude waiting
which is desired?
All desires all ideas to disempower to devalue is not easy.
If attained Nirvana is attained.
The attainment while difficult
to sustain is nearly impossible.
In a room breathe, defecate, drink, eat, sleep, urinate,
but nothing else do.
The first day is relaxing.
Can a week be sustained?
Can a month be endured?
For what duration is mindless existence sustainable?
"Cogito ergo sum"
"je pense donc je suis"
"I think therefore I am"
René Descartes please thank.
Thought when abstained
the self does not vanish.
During meditation the self does not cease.
Merely by the mind the self is forgotten.
Nirvana if attained outside worlds outside life
to sit to wait alone uncaring unwatching uninterested is attained.
Siddhartha Gautama the Buddhism founder was correct.
The paydom proclivities when sustained
in this life and the next
to suffering minds go.
To ideas the importance since accorded
the proclivities are solicited.
Thus the importance when changed
the proclivities and destination also change.
Nirvana, as the suffering end, when stated sound groovy.
As sans ambition, as sans interest as self forgetting,
as boredom forgetting, as forever being alone
when described Nirvana might not seem as desirable.
Nirvana is not wrong.
Nirvana is a choice.
By very few minds Nirvana can be chosen.
On a freedom world Siddhartha Gautama
might not have been previously born.
For innumerable lifetimes among paydom worlds
many minds flounder.
Nirvana afore attaining
for a lifetime or two or many
on a freedom world why not vacation?
Could be fun.
Nirvana for attainment time enough exists.